Event, which occurred in London on July 7, 2005, was against the September 11, 2001 by its extent relatively small. The difference was not only in the relatively small number of dead and wounded people, but also in comparatively low material damages. Notwithstanding, this event deserves attention and inclusion among an important emergencies. First, we summarize the government (official) version in a nutshell, and consequently we get closer the unofficial.
Since it is not so long ago, it is possible to assume that everyone remembers surely very well on July 7, 2005, the bomb attacks in London. According to the official version islamic terrorists had to make three bomb attacks in the London subway around 8.50 a.m. and one bomb attack in the city double-decker bus at 9.47 a.m. By the result was 52 dead and several hundred of injured persons.[11]
This version was born very quickly. If an unofficial version about the events of September 11, 2001 came in to light by slow steps for several years, in this case it already was only about days and weeks.
It was planned an exercise on July 7, 2005, which had the task to simulate explosions in the subway at approximately the same time and at the same place where really came to explosions.[9] This might explain so rapid action of rescue units during explosions in tube.
Proponents of the unofficial version point also to the train timetable. To the public was told that the terrorists got on the train at the railway station in Luton at 7.40 a.m.[7] They had already to walk in the London station hall of King's Cross railway station at 8.26 a.m.[8] The train departing from Luton at 7.40 a.m. was but canceled.[4], [10] The terrorists would had to catch a train at 7.25 a.m.[4]
Despite of the large number of security cameras has been published no a shot, which would captured foursome of these terrorists together in London.[3] However, the analysis itself of the record from the security camera, capturing alleged terrorists before Luton railway station, brought quite interesting results. It showed by more detailed examination that maybe it is a case of a photomontage.[6], [2]
Bruce Lait was in one of the subway cars when the explosion occurred. He survived explosion without serious injuries, but not all, who were just close, had the same luck. Nevertheless he describes the place of explosion as follows: „The metal was pushed upwards as if the bomb was underneath the train. They seem to think the bomb was left in a bag, but I don't remember anybody being where the bomb was, or any bag.“[1] With similar testimony about metal sheet bent inside came also one woman who entered into the damaged car in order to help the injured.[5]
It would not be useful to deal with an enumeration of all discrepancies, on which proponents of the unofficial version point, hence we mentioned at least those the most important.
There is a whole range of contradictions of the unofficial version with the government version. The British government maybe could remove some doubts if she would consent to the publication of records from security cameras, otherwise it would seem that she tries to hide something from the public.
We develop extraordinary manual filter-and-ventilation device that has no equivalent in the world. It will be intended for civilians who can use it not only in the case of nuclear, chemical and biological war, but in the case of different chemical accidents as well.